Luc to play another year
Started by Deuce, Jun 29 2004 07:11 AM
13 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 29 June 2004 - 07:11 AM
#2
Posted 29 June 2004 - 08:06 AM
It would totaly kill LA if every one left in the summer, they would be using Rookies on the top line. One player will make a lot of difference, but they should still try and get every one back.
#3
Posted 29 June 2004 - 08:09 AM
The only others that will be UFA this thursday are Ziggy (which is huge) Lappy (which isnt that big of a deal) and Modry (which one again isnt that big a deal, I personally like Modry but if we lost him I would understand)
#4
Posted 29 June 2004 - 08:20 AM
It's just when I think of LA i think of Ziggy, Luc and Lappy. I don't see any one else being able to step up into the names, if you know what I mean.
#5
Posted 29 June 2004 - 08:23 AM
I hear ya! I love Luc, Ziggy, and Lappy. I pray that Ziggy gets signed as a King sometime soon and it would be great to have Lappy back but if he wants to much money then I understand the teams decision to let him go. We have a younger version of Lappy in Avery and he will take on that role fine. As far as Ziggy, no one in this league can replace what Ziggy brings to the Kings. He is the driving force behind the Kings and I hope that he remains a King but if his desire is to go somewhere to try and win it all or make more money, who can blame him?
#6
Posted 29 June 2004 - 08:36 AM
Palffy, Deadmarsh, and Allison are all most likely gone. It's not July 1 yet, but it is not looking good for the Kings, which sorry, does not break my heart on any level. I hope you like the Monarchs!
#7
Posted 29 June 2004 - 08:40 AM
Does Robitaille "guarantee" that he will be back with the Kings? Just like he guaranteed the Kings fans that the Kings would make the playoffs, then watched as the team lost their last 11 games?
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
That's good for the Kings if there is a 2004-2005, but if the lockout washes out next year, do the Kings really want a 39-year old Luc?
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
That's good for the Kings if there is a 2004-2005, but if the lockout washes out next year, do the Kings really want a 39-year old Luc?
#8
Posted 29 June 2004 - 08:44 AM
Luc IS the Kings. Without him, pack it in!
#9
Posted 29 June 2004 - 08:49 AM
QUOTE (SacredCow @ Jun 29 2004, 08:40 AM)
Does Robitaille "guarantee" that he will be back with the Kings? Just like he guaranteed the Kings fans that the Kings would make the playoffs, then watched as the team lost their last 11 games?
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Not a big deal, just remember when I do the same thing thats its ok because Mods do it. Thanks for allowing a little fun on the board. I look forward to it!!!!
#10
Posted 29 June 2004 - 11:48 AM
QUOTE (QuacksMeUp @ Jun 29 2004, 09:44 AM)
Luc IS the Kings. Without him, pack it in!
So, what happened last season?
#11
Posted 29 June 2004 - 12:11 PM
QUOTE (Dark_Knight @ Jun 29 2004, 11:48 AM)
QUOTE (QuacksMeUp @ Jun 29 2004, 09:44 AM)
Luc IS the Kings. Without him, pack it in!
So, what happened last season? Don't you mean --- so what happened every season since their inception???!!!
lmao
#12
Posted 29 June 2004 - 01:41 PM
Luc is probably gonna go back to Detroit
#13
Posted 29 June 2004 - 02:05 PM
With all the injuries to the Kings these past two years, they already have had a high number of rookies playing. One year is a fluke, two years in a row looks like a curse.
#14
Posted 29 June 2004 - 02:48 PM
luc!!!!!!!!!
he is so important for them they need him and ziggy too!!!
he was nearly te top-scorer last season with only 35 games!!!
not bad!!!
he is so important for them they need him and ziggy too!!!
he was nearly te top-scorer last season with only 35 games!!!
not bad!!!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













