State of the League
#1
Posted 09 July 2007 - 11:10 PM
#2
Posted 09 July 2007 - 11:48 PM
#4
Posted 10 July 2007 - 09:24 AM
They focus too much on TV ratings. Hockey is NOT a TV sport. Never will be...
NEVER say never!!!
Just one of the mottos I've discovered in life.
Hockey in HD is very watchable, although nothing beats being at the game.
#5
Posted 10 July 2007 - 11:55 AM
#6
Posted 10 July 2007 - 06:55 PM
#7
Posted 12 July 2007 - 03:12 PM
#8
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:25 AM
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER, ANAHEIM DUCKS: "Coaches and players are more comfortable with how to play with the new rules. It's a big adjustment not being able to do a lot of the things you were before. It took awhile for guys to adjust, especially older guys like myself who have been around for a while and were used to playing a certain way."
Q : Is it time for the NHL to revisit the standard of officiating to try to open up the game?
NIEDERMAYER: "The officials have done a decent job holding the standard up. They're still calling it very tight. I don't think it's gotten too far away. You know if you get your stick up anywhere near the hands, you're going to get called."
Q If you were given the chance to make one change to the game, what would it be?
NIEDERMAYER: "You could give a penalty for not having someone moving forward -- if you're standing behind the net, they'd have to have one player moving forward to chase you out from behind the net. In the good old days, someone would chase Paul Coffey out from behind the net, and off he'd go."
<other players' responses here>
#9
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:35 AM
One suggestion is that players would be forced to indicate their intentions sooner than December or face being placed on the retired list.
"If I had to declare earlier, my answer probably would have been different," Niedermayer said during the All-Star weekend in Atlanta. "If they think that's a good idea, that's fine with me. But if I had to make a decision sooner, I probably wouldn't be standing right here."
<link>
#10
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:03 PM
#11
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:07 PM
#12
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:17 PM
#13
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:21 PM
Oh, ok. Let's try this. Isn't it interesting that the Board of Governors allows the NHL to be run by a moron?
#14
Posted 03 February 2008 - 12:24 PM
Interesting yet scary at the same time because it follows that some/most governors must be morons too.
#15
Posted 03 February 2008 - 10:00 PM
That would explain the Los Angeles Kings organization...
#16
Posted 03 February 2008 - 10:15 PM
nothing can explain 40 years of Suck
#17
Posted 25 March 2008 - 11:19 AM
The late-season surge has ensured another season of record NHL attendance. The 2007-08 per-game average of 17,194 is running 1.7% ahead of the 2006-07 campaign, which concluded with a record figure of 16,961. The NHL will surpass 20 million in total attendance for the seventh consecutive season and will, for the first time in its 90-season history, conclude the regular season with a per-game average in excess of 17,000.
#18
Posted 25 March 2008 - 11:27 AM
#19
Posted 26 March 2008 - 03:58 PM
The Florida Panthers, Los Angeles Kings, Buffalo Sabres, Pittsburgh Penguins, Atlanta Thrashers, New York Islanders, Tampa Bay Lightning, Washington Capitals, San Jose Sharks, Columbus Blue Jackets, Phoenix Coyotes and Nashville Predators are the 12 lowest payroll teams, and the Penguins and Sharks are the only teams in that group in a playoff position.
"The fact is that money has always talked, and it carries the preponderance of play," said Anaheim Ducks general manager Brian Burke. "A top-five payroll team may indeed win the Stanley Cup, but money is still a good predictor of success. A top payroll won't guarantee you a Cup, but you can dress a better lineup."
<USA Today link>
#20
Posted 05 April 2008 - 06:25 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














