Jump to content


Play the Percentages No. 14


12 replies to this topic

Poll: Play the Percentages No. 14 (20 member(s) have cast votes)

The most difficult thing to explain to a non-hockey fan is...

  1. Offsides (6 votes [30.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.00%

  2. Changing on the fly (2 votes [10.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  3. Power play (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Slap shot as opposed to one-timer or wrister (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. Too many men (is that possible?) (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. "Butterfly" goalie (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  7. Icing the puck (6 votes [30.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.00%

  8. George Parros (4 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

  9. Power players (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  10. Other (explain yourself) (2 votes [10.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 QuacksMeUp

    Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,116 posts
  • Location:The South Bay

Posted 06 January 2008 - 09:35 PM


What do you think is the most difficult thing to explain to someone watching their first hockey game at the Pond?

#2 tohon

    Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 49 posts
  • Location:Riversida, CA, USA
  • Interests:Athletic Training, Hockey

Posted 06 January 2008 - 09:45 PM

I chose Icing. I can explain the rule, but when the person asks me why, I don't have an answer.

#3 432j

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,546 posts
  • Interests:Hockey. Hockey. More Hockey.

Posted 06 January 2008 - 10:04 PM

I can explain any of them. It's just that some people lack the mental capacity to understand. smile.gif

I took offsides, because it's the one that I usually have to explain a number of times before people seem to grasp it.

#4 Todrick

    Ducks Outsider

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,706 posts
  • Location:Behind the Orange Curtain

Posted 07 January 2008 - 12:05 AM

easily Parros.

cause it evolves into the age old 'fighting is tradition' discussion where you have to inevitably explain that george asks if he can 'get a fight'

#5 LightItUp4126

    Section V Ruthless Aggressors

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,407 posts
  • Location:Westbrook, Maine
  • Interests:I like most sports in general, but at the top is hockey, then NASCAR, then football and baseball. I don't do much, but I do play hockey for my high school team. I'm 16 and extremely apathetic and a big time procrastinator, but no time to care about that now, I've got posts to make!

Posted 07 January 2008 - 06:26 AM

Icing.

Everyone usually knows what fighting is. It's why new fans go.

Icing is common, and the easiest to explain.

Or you could do a run-down of penalty calls.

#6 Dutch Duck

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,395 posts
  • Location:The Hague, The Netherlands

Posted 07 January 2008 - 07:36 AM

More options should be possible in this case. When I try to explain hockey to my fellow Dutchmen, they usually don't get offsides. They don't get icing the puck, although offsides they just refuse to understand. But the hardest part to explain is the fighting: 'Is that legal?', 'They don't get suspended for that?', 'That's sick!'. NO! That's cool to watch! Seeing Ryan Getzlaf toe-drag his way around the defense and feed Corey Perry in the slot is sick.

#7 Dark Knight

    Shadow of the Ducks

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 62,085 posts

Posted 07 January 2008 - 09:01 AM

If we're playing LA, it's hard to explain that they're pros. Or something lol_1.gif

#8 Ducksrule08

    2nd Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,221 posts
  • Location:Placentia, CA
  • Interests:Hockey, mainly sports

Posted 07 January 2008 - 10:34 AM

Icing

With offsides in a close second

#9 QuacksMeUp

    Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,116 posts
  • Location:The South Bay

Posted 07 January 2008 - 11:09 AM

QUOTE (Dark Knight @ Jan 7 2008, 09:01 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If we're playing LA, it's hard to explain that they're pros. Or something lol_1.gif



#10 DucksSnip

    Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,263 posts
  • Location:Boise
  • Interests:&quot;DA.....DUCKS''

Posted 07 January 2008 - 11:24 AM

offsides....seems like i have to explain it about 4 or 5 different ways before people can even start to comprehend it

#11 QuackHead

    Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,350 posts

Posted 07 January 2008 - 11:51 AM

I have to explain icing alot. Offsides is next. I still can't see it half the time.

#12 MrsBevo

    Hockeyaholic

  • Mods
  • 7,780 posts

Posted 07 January 2008 - 05:08 PM

Not everyone understands fighting. Took my sister to a game a few years ago. She did not understand why the two players were fighting and even funnier, leaned over and asked why the refs weren't stopping them. After I was done laughing, I explained, but she still didn't get it.


#13 alexxx

    Living Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 756 posts
  • Location:Las Vegas
  • Interests:Ducks hockey<br />Jets Hockey<br />Hockey<br />Twitter<br />Rock/Punk/Alt music<br />Songwriting<br />Singing<br />Enjoying life while I can

Posted 23 January 2008 - 05:46 PM

And it annoys me to know end: why it's not boring.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users