Here are some choices and a list of players who have worn the number for the Ducks:
Number 2
Bobby Dollas
Fredrik Olausson
Number 5
Drew Bannister
Robert Dirk
Kevin Haller
Ric Jackman
Ruslan Salei
Vitaly Vishnevski
Number 6
Sean Hill
Doug Houda
Don McSweeny
Vitaly Vishnevski
Number 25
Chris Pronger
Frank Banham
Todd Krygier
Adrien Plavsic
Kevin Sawyer
Terry Yake
Number 95
This number has never been worn by a Duck so far as I can see.
0
What should Lupul's number be?
Started by QuacksMeUp, Jun 29 2009 10:06 AM
33 replies to this topic
#2
-
- Members
-
- 9,706 posts
Ducks Outsider
- Location:Behind the Orange Curtain
Posted 29 June 2009 - 10:42 AM
Fixed it for you...
and that's the reason for me picking #25
But I also concur with Anything But 7
QUOTE (QuacksMeUp @ Jun 29 2009, 11:06 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Number 25
Chris Pronger
Frank Banham
Todd Krygier
Adrien Plavsic
Kevin Sawyer
Terry Yake
Chris Pronger
Frank Banham
Todd Krygier
Adrien Plavsic
Kevin Sawyer
Terry Yake
and that's the reason for me picking #25
But I also concur with Anything But 7
#3
-
- Members
-
- 12,052 posts
Legend
Posted 29 June 2009 - 10:50 AM
I voted "Other".
30 would be a good number for him in more ways than one.
#4
-
- Members
-
- 778 posts
T-Shirt streak since October 22, 2007
- Location:Westminster, CO
- Interests:Hockey.
Posted 29 June 2009 - 11:03 AM
I voted "other" I think 51 would look good, just flipping the 1 and 5 obviously.
#5
-
- Members
-
- 22,694 posts
Legend
- Location:Saku, Estonia
- Interests:My family<br />NHL hockey<br />sports<br />Pop of 80s
Posted 29 June 2009 - 11:22 AM
QUOTE (jusducks6 @ Jun 29 2009, 12:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I voted "other" I think 51 would look good, just flipping the 1 and 5 obviously.
Agree
#6
-
- Members
-
- 158 posts
Rookie
Posted 29 June 2009 - 11:49 AM
6 seems like a fine number... doesn't really matter tho
#7
-
- Members
-
- 9,706 posts
Ducks Outsider
- Location:Behind the Orange Curtain
Posted 29 June 2009 - 02:14 PM
QUOTE (jusducks6 @ Jun 29 2009, 12:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I voted "other" I think 51 would look good, just flipping the 1 and 5 obviously.
save for the fact that would mean he hasn't "made the team" yet.
the Ducks use the Old School, Low numbers for the Team, high numbers for the Prospects/rookies.
#8
-
- Members
-
- 696 posts
3rd Line
- Location:San Diego, CA
Posted 29 June 2009 - 02:40 PM
I voted Other, how bout '4'... for Quadruple Lupul.
#9
-
- Members
-
- 6,116 posts
Legend
- Location:The South Bay
Posted 29 June 2009 - 03:16 PM
QUOTE (VegasJeff @ Jun 29 2009, 03:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I voted Other, how bout '4'... for Quadruple Lupul.
4 and 7 are both off my list forever for different reasons. But it was a nice thought. I would rather see the 4 up on the jumbotron than on Lupul's back though.
#10
-
- Members
-
- 1,368 posts
2nd Line
- Interests:Sunderland AFC<br />and<br />Anaheim Ducks<br />+ music
Posted 29 June 2009 - 03:22 PM
lupuls number should be # 17
#11
-
- Members
-
- 5,422 posts
Legend
Posted 30 June 2009 - 01:17 PM
QUOTE (VegasJeff @ Jun 29 2009, 03:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I voted Other, how bout '4'... for Quadruple Lupul.
#16 makes sense but he'll have to ask Parros to give it up. 4x4=16
#12
-
- Members
-
- 6,116 posts
Legend
- Location:The South Bay
Posted 30 June 2009 - 01:38 PM
QUOTE (ladiesandgentlemen @ Jun 29 2009, 11:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I voted "Other".
30 would be a good number for him in more ways than one.
30 would be a good number for him in more ways than one.
I came up with 15 x 2nd time around = 30. What is another reason? (don't laugh, it took me until last evening to figure out the one reason I did come up with!)
#13
-
- Members
-
- 12,052 posts
Legend
Posted 30 June 2009 - 01:58 PM
QUOTE (QuacksMeUp @ Jun 30 2009, 02:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
... What is another reason? ...
I was hoping it would give him a goal to shoot for.
Put one of these
on there for thirty of them if necessary.
#14
-
- Members
-
- 6,116 posts
Legend
- Location:The South Bay
Posted 30 June 2009 - 02:12 PM
QUOTE (ladiesandgentlemen @ Jun 30 2009, 02:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I was hoping it would give him a goal to shoot for.
Put one of these on there for thirty of them if necessary.
Put one of these
on there for thirty of them if necessary.Ah!
#15
-
- Members
-
- 2,314 posts
On Wisconsin
- Location:Wisconsin
Posted 30 June 2009 - 07:41 PM
6. It's flashy, yet casual.
#16
-
- Members
-
- 4,673 posts
when is that giant barstool going to do something
- Location:The OC
Posted 30 June 2009 - 08:22 PM
QUOTE (Todrick @ Jun 29 2009, 03:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
save for the fact that would mean he hasn't "made the team" yet.
the Ducks use the Old School, Low numbers for the Team, high numbers for the Prospects/rookies.
the Ducks use the Old School, Low numbers for the Team, high numbers for the Prospects/rookies.
i like 51 too but i thought the same thing so now i say he goes with 5 or 6
#17
-
- Members
-
- 68 posts
Prospect
Posted 30 June 2009 - 09:40 PM
Whatever he wants but 2-7 are traditionally defensmen numbers,right?. Other than that the only low numbers available I think are 11 and 14. Can he get #20 if Ryan Carter is in the AHL?
#18
-
- Members
-
- 1,546 posts
Across the Pond
- Location:Billericay, England, About 5450 miles from Honda Center :(
- Interests:Ducks hockey, videogames (mainly Nintendo), anime, sports logo design
Posted 01 July 2009 - 04:07 AM
I'm confused. What's with all the hate on number 7?
I'm definitely missing something if this number isn't getting any love.
I'm definitely missing something if this number isn't getting any love.
#19
-
- Members
-
- 6,116 posts
Legend
- Location:The South Bay
Posted 01 July 2009 - 07:56 AM
No. 7s
Pavel Trnka 1993-2001 Total games with Ducks 322
Milos Holan 1994-96
Alexei Kasatonov 1993-94
Bruno St. Jacques 2005-06
Shane Hnidy
Marc Andre Bergeron
Brendan Morrison
Pavel Trnka 1993-2001 Total games with Ducks 322
Milos Holan 1994-96
Alexei Kasatonov 1993-94
Bruno St. Jacques 2005-06
Shane Hnidy
Marc Andre Bergeron
Brendan Morrison
#20
-
- Members
-
- 929 posts
3rd Line
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:32 PM
QUOTE (chknwng @ Jun 30 2009, 10:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Whatever he wants but 2-7 are traditionally defensmen numbers,right?. Other than that the only low numbers available I think are 11 and 14. Can he get #20 if Ryan Carter is in the AHL?
Carter earned a spot with his performance in the playoffs.
51 to complete the circle (Getz goes from 51 to 15, Lupul does the reverse).
#21
-
- Members
-
- 1,656 posts
The gunslinger
- Location:Langenfeld, Germany
- Interests:Guess what? It's hockey! x.x
Posted 03 July 2009 - 01:53 AM
I think he should get #11.
#22
-
- Members
-
- 3,395 posts
Hall of Famer
- Location:The Hague, The Netherlands
Posted 03 July 2009 - 02:08 AM
I voted 6. Stay with the low numbers.
#23
-
- Members
-
- 4,673 posts
when is that giant barstool going to do something
- Location:The OC
Posted 03 July 2009 - 10:31 AM
QUOTE (German Rocket #7 @ Jul 3 2009, 02:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think he should get #11.
11 would be cool
#24
-
- Members
-
- 5,567 posts
Legend
Posted 06 July 2009 - 09:43 AM
I say #75 because I can't think of a single NHL player that has ever worn that number for more than a year or two. When you see #75 on the ice you know it's Joffrey Lupul!
#25
-
- Members
-
- 6,116 posts
Legend
- Location:The South Bay
Posted 06 July 2009 - 10:38 AM
QUOTE (TroyLoney @ Jul 6 2009, 10:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I say #75 because I can't think of a single NHL player that has ever worn that number for more than a year or two. When you see #75 on the ice you know it's Joffrey Lupul!
Players who have worn #75:
Yann Danis, Montreal Canadiens 2005-06
Leroy Goldsworthy, Montreal Canadiens 1934-35
Michal Grosek, Winnipeg Jets 1993-96
Chris Hajt, Washington Capitals 2003-04
Brett Lindros, New York Islanders 1994-96
Colton Orr, Boston Bruins 2005-06
Walt Poddubny, Quebec Nordiques 1988-89
Jack Portland, Montreal Canadiens 1934-35
Des Roche, Montreal Canadiens 1934-35
Pete Vandermeer, Phoenix Coyotes 2007-08
#26
-
- Members
-
- 5,567 posts
Legend
Posted 06 July 2009 - 10:45 AM
QUOTE (QuacksMeUp @ Jul 6 2009, 11:38 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Players who have worn #75:
Yann Danis, Montreal Canadiens 2005-06
Leroy Goldsworthy, Montreal Canadiens 1934-35
Michal Grosek, Winnipeg Jets 1993-96
Chris Hajt, Washington Capitals 2003-04
Brett Lindros, New York Islanders 1994-96
Colton Orr, Boston Bruins 2005-06
Walt Poddubny, Quebec Nordiques 1988-89
Jack Portland, Montreal Canadiens 1934-35
Des Roche, Montreal Canadiens 1934-35
Pete Vandermeer, Phoenix Coyotes 2007-08
Yann Danis, Montreal Canadiens 2005-06
Leroy Goldsworthy, Montreal Canadiens 1934-35
Michal Grosek, Winnipeg Jets 1993-96
Chris Hajt, Washington Capitals 2003-04
Brett Lindros, New York Islanders 1994-96
Colton Orr, Boston Bruins 2005-06
Walt Poddubny, Quebec Nordiques 1988-89
Jack Portland, Montreal Canadiens 1934-35
Des Roche, Montreal Canadiens 1934-35
Pete Vandermeer, Phoenix Coyotes 2007-08
Michael Grosek played a total of 28 games for the Jets, Brett Lindros played in just 51 NHL games and the rest of those guys only wore #75 for one season. It's perfect! Lupul can claim #75 as his own and establish some history in that number.
#27
-
- Members
-
- 9,706 posts
Ducks Outsider
- Location:Behind the Orange Curtain
Posted 06 July 2009 - 10:53 AM
QUOTE (TroyLoney @ Jul 6 2009, 10:43 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I say #75 because I can't think of a single NHL player that has ever worn that number for more than a year or two. When you see #75 on the ice you know it's Joffrey Lupul!
Okay, sorry, Troy, gotta call you out here...
This read #83 before, and made reference to the year he was born... but continued with the same
"I can't think of a single NHL player that has ever worn that number for more than a year or two. When you see #** on the ice you know it's Joffrey Lupul!"
I was going to let it go and let someone else point out Ales Hemsky... But...
so did ya change it cause of Hemsky? or because 75 is closer to 15?
#28
-
- Members
-
- 5,567 posts
Legend
Posted 06 July 2009 - 11:05 AM
QUOTE (Todrick @ Jul 6 2009, 11:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Okay, sorry, Troy, gotta call you out here...
This read #83 before, and made reference to the year he was born... but continued with the same
"I can't think of a single NHL player that has ever worn that number for more than a year or two. When you see #** on the ice you know it's Joffrey Lupul!"
I was going to let it go and let someone else point out Ales Hemsky... But...
so did ya change it cause of Hemsky? or because 75 is closer to 15?
This read #83 before, and made reference to the year he was born... but continued with the same
"I can't think of a single NHL player that has ever worn that number for more than a year or two. When you see #** on the ice you know it's Joffrey Lupul!"
I was going to let it go and let someone else point out Ales Hemsky... But...
so did ya change it cause of Hemsky? or because 75 is closer to 15?
I changed it because of Hemsky. Can't have him wearing the same number as some stiff on the Oilers, can we?
It was originally #75, then I changed it to #83 to make it the year he was born, then remembered Hemsky and changed it back.
#29
-
- Members
-
- 3,395 posts
Hall of Famer
- Location:The Hague, The Netherlands
Posted 06 July 2009 - 11:36 AM
QUOTE (TroyLoney @ Jul 6 2009, 09:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I changed it because of Hemsky. Can't have him wearing the same number as some stiff on the Oilers, can we?
It was originally #75, then I changed it to #83 to make it the year he was born, then remembered Hemsky and changed it back.
It was originally #75, then I changed it to #83 to make it the year he was born, then remembered Hemsky and changed it back.
How about #84 then?
#30
-
- Members
-
- 5,567 posts
Legend
Posted 06 July 2009 - 11:56 AM
QUOTE (Dutch Duck @ Jul 6 2009, 12:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How about #84 then?
That's just as good. #93 would be nice as a tribute to the year the Ducks came into the NHL.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
