WAIVED: Erik Christensen
#1
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:39 AM
6 games
0 goals
0 assists
5 shots
4 hits
-2
This guy is awful and it bothers me that he is still here, and getting ice time, while Andrew Ebbett was sent packing. I want to hear all the Christensen supporters tell me how wrong I am, again, and that this guy is a stud just waiting to bust out. Or how he was injured in the past but he's healthy now. He found a way to not score with an empty net staring at him in the first period yesterday, he's not a physical presence, he's not worth a damn in the defensive zone and his only marketable skill (shootouts) is irrelevant because the Ducks suck too much to ever get to one.
Yeah, yeah - all the Ducks are struggling right now, but only three forwards have played in six or more games and have yet to score a point - Todd Marchant, George Parros and this stiff. Marchant hits, hustles and is a guy that we've seen play very good hockey for the Ducks in the past. Parros is a fighter and he's doing his job. Christensen? Nothing. What does this stiff bring to this team? Hell, even Nick Boynton has an assist this season and he's spent the majority of his time shuffling between the press box and the third defensive pairing!
I only bring this up because I talked all summer about how crappy this guy was and I was told time and again that I was wrong. Well, I wasn't. He sucks and he should never have been re-signed. I hope he is placed on waivers soon and then, when nobody claims him, he's sent to Bakersfield where he belongs.
#2
Posted 27 October 2009 - 09:07 AM
If he doesn't get things going fast, then choosing him over Ebbett was a bad decision. Although in reality we don't need either.
#3
Posted 02 November 2009 - 09:33 AM
#4
Posted 02 November 2009 - 09:42 AM
#5
Posted 02 November 2009 - 09:44 AM
Maybe this is the opportunity Kyle Calder was hoping for
#6
Posted 02 November 2009 - 09:51 AM
Nooooo CRUUUUSH!
#7
Posted 02 November 2009 - 10:05 AM
#8
Posted 02 November 2009 - 10:05 AM
I hope so...... Should have kept Ebbett over Christensen.
#9
Posted 02 November 2009 - 10:08 AM
Can he really be worse then Christiansen?
#10
Posted 02 November 2009 - 10:47 AM
It's a shame that we gave a good prospect in O'Dell for him...
Still, I hope he does get picked up by some team.
#11
Posted 02 November 2009 - 10:56 AM
Hallelujah!
#12
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:04 AM
#13
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:14 AM
I agree.
#14
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:22 AM
Still, I hope he does get picked up by some team.
It has definitely turned out to be a bad trade for the Ducks.
#15
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:31 AM
I'd love to hear from Sojourn and DucksFan39 to find out whether or not they feel this is a mistake by the Ducks since they were the two people I argued with the most over the summer about the Ducks decision to re-sign Dream Crusher and his potential with the team.
#16
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:39 AM
Well, I was pretty vocal that the Ducks needed to re-sign him. As I said at the time, I felt they paid a high price to obtain him in dealing O'Dell and that they needed to protect their investment.
Frankly, I think Erik is another one of those players who never really established a particular role for himself on the team. OTOH, I think he's also one who never had a consistent opportunity from the coach either. I'm amazed at the long leash that Festerling and Mikkelson got/get from Carlyle and how others like Miller, Carter and Christensen are bounced up and down the lines like a yo yo and in and out of the line up.
Despite the repeated talk I see here about Carlyle being good at developing young talent, I honestly think the opposite is quite true - and, as a result - it is why we've seen a long line of Mark Motzko's come in and out of town instead of growing our own young players. Outside of Getzlaf, Perry, Ryan and Mikkelson, I'm hard pressed to think of any other young players that have stuck. And, I'd hardly give credit to Randy on those forwards. It was their talent, not his coaching, that has them in the NHL.
I don't think Christensen will be a huge loss or anything, but I think it was a waste of O'Dell and his departure sure as shoot isn't going to propel this team onto a playoff track.
Quite bluntly, it's change for the sake of avoiding the real issue: Randy Carlyle.
#17
Posted 02 November 2009 - 11:49 AM
Joe.
Joe Motzko, not Mark.
#18
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:41 PM
Which is stupid
#19
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:44 PM
Joe Motzko, not Mark.
Yeah, you're thinking of Mark Mowers.
#20
Posted 02 November 2009 - 12:48 PM
#21
Posted 02 November 2009 - 01:02 PM
How far back do you want to go?
#22
Posted 02 November 2009 - 01:22 PM
Ugh... I know, I guess I was just going back to the post-Cup season...
Coach Randy Carlyle said that if Christensen wasn’t claimed, they would like him to try to improve and regain confidence at the lower level.
#23
Posted 02 November 2009 - 01:52 PM
Hartigan.
Joe Motzko, not Mark.
Stupid meds making my mind loopy.
Oh, and if you're including Morrison, then Bertuzzi probably belongs there, too.
Sutherby. Krog. Green. Friessen.
#24
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:04 PM
#25
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:36 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













