Alright, sound off! What did you think about the moves made? How will it impact the final stretch?
0
Trade Grades
Started by RGS_Quack93, Mar 03 2010 01:36 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
-
- Members
-
- 5,842 posts
Stache Bashin'
- Location:Mission Viejo, CA
-
Interests:Ducks Hockey
Angels Baseball
USC Football
Cowboys Football
bars
Motocross
Computers
Shooting
Posted 03 March 2010 - 01:36 PM
#2
-
- Members
-
- 62,085 posts
Shadow of the Ducks
Posted 03 March 2010 - 02:17 PM
Gave it a B in part because of the Visnovsky trade. We'll see how they work out...
#3
-
- Members
-
- 9,707 posts
Ducks Outsider
- Location:Behind the Orange Curtain
Posted 03 March 2010 - 02:17 PM
I gave a 'B'.
would have been an 'A' if we had not bottle-necked our backups
OR if we had cleared out our 3rd and 4th liners a bit more...
I want to see Carlyle forced to go with 3 scoring lines.
would have been an 'A' if we had not bottle-necked our backups
OR if we had cleared out our 3rd and 4th liners a bit more...
I want to see Carlyle forced to go with 3 scoring lines.
#4
-
- Members
-
- 5,842 posts
Stache Bashin'
- Location:Mission Viejo, CA
-
Interests:Ducks Hockey
Angels Baseball
USC Football
Cowboys Football
bars
Motocross
Computers
Shooting
Posted 03 March 2010 - 02:33 PM
I went with B.
A would have been given if the house was cleaned out a little more. Also I dont get the full roster lineup of goalies we now have to deal with.
Overall though good job by Murray, now we just have to sit back and see if it all works out well.
A would have been given if the house was cleaned out a little more. Also I dont get the full roster lineup of goalies we now have to deal with.
Overall though good job by Murray, now we just have to sit back and see if it all works out well.
#5
-
- Members
-
- 2,747 posts
Franchise Player
Posted 03 March 2010 - 11:48 PM
QUOTE (RGS_Quack93 @ Mar 3 2010, 02:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I went with B.
A would have been given if the house was cleaned out a little more. Also I dont get the full roster lineup of goalies we now have to deal with.
Overall though good job by Murray, now we just have to sit back and see if it all works out well.
A would have been given if the house was cleaned out a little more. Also I dont get the full roster lineup of goalies we now have to deal with.
Overall though good job by Murray, now we just have to sit back and see if it all works out well.
hmmm maybe goalies are like railroads in Monopoly? Yeah, ya need a goalie I have X goalies and I'm charging $$$ for 'em. mwuahahahahahahaa
#6
-
- Members
-
- 2,319 posts
2007 Stanley Cup Champions
- Location:The OC
Posted 07 March 2010 - 02:45 PM
D
This team still has a gaping hole in the defense that Murray did not address.
This team still has a gaping hole in the defense that Murray did not address.
#7
-
- Members
-
- 2,747 posts
Franchise Player
Posted 07 March 2010 - 04:14 PM
QUOTE (DucksRule00 @ Mar 7 2010, 02:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
D
This team still has a gaping hole in the defense that Murray did not address.
This team still has a gaping hole in the defense that Murray did not address.
That begs a question.
Who did we get that we have signed on past the rest of this season? Are all these temp fixs?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
