Getzlaf & Perry
#1
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:42 AM
Perry (before being named to Team Canada)
16 goals
25 assists
41 points
40 games
Projected out over a season that's 33 goals, 51 assists for 86 points.
Perry (since being named to Team Canada)
6 goals
13 assists
19 points
23 games
Projected out over a season that's 21 goals, 46 assists for 67 points.
Perry has definitely cooled off since the motivation to make Team Canada was removed. Is that a coincedence? Maybe. But I don't think it is. I think it's another example of how these two players need something to motivate them or else they will simply not give their best effort on a regular basis.
It's not just with the Ducks, either. In the Olympics both Perry & Getzlaf started slow. Mike Babcock had to have a talk with them after the first couple of games and after that we saw them become dominant players for Team Canada. (LINK) Then they come back to Anaheim and lay an egg as they combined for no goals, one assist, -2 and one hit (they were also 8-for-22 in the faceoff circle for a whopping 36% success rate) against the Avalanche last night.
This has been an issue with both of them for years now and I, for one, am getting sick of it. When they play hard they are dominant and almost impossible to stop as we have seen in the past. When they don't play hard, though, they suck up 20+ minutes a night with no results...as we've seen in the past. I know it's possible for a player to play hard at least 90% of the time because I've seen Alexander Ovechkin do it for years now. Dan Sexton is currently doing it for the Ducks as well. If Getzlaf & Perry simply had the drive of a guy like Sexton think how good they would be. I'm not asking for them to play balls to the wall hockey every single night but at least 90% of the time. They are being paid millions and they should be held to that standard, in my opinion.
We entered this season thinking that the line of Ryan/Getzlaf/Perry would be one of, if not the, best lines in all of hockey and that has not been the case...at all. Why? Some may blame head coach Randy Carlyle but I have to believe that Carlyle is doing all he can to get those guys to play their best every single game. To me the responsibility lies with them and them alone. They have to want to play hard because if they decide to give less than their best effort nothing any coach, player or fan can say will change that.
Maybe I'm expecting too much out of them. Maybe I'm not being fair and I've overevaluated them. I don't think so, though. I want to see Getzlaf and Perry live up to their potential and play like we all know they can play for an entire season instead of just a few games here and there. They have what it takes to be among the truly elite players in this league and yet they are closer to guys like Tomas Plekanec and Mike Green in production this season than they are to guys like Crosby, Thornton, Sedin or Kane. That's not acceptable to me. Getzlaf dominated Joe Thornton in the playoffs last season but Joe is on his way to his third 100 point season while Getzlaf is on pace for 87 points. It's not a huge difference but it's the difference between being a consistent star player and being a very good player. Getzlaf and Perry have the physical talent to be consistent star players and I hope they can get the mental attitude to realize that potential.
#2
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:45 AM
Funny about an hour ago I thought, " I wonder how long before they get their own thread?" haha
#3
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:47 AM
#4
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:48 AM
#5
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:53 AM
#6
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:54 AM
What struck me was watching them play Colorado last night and looking at the point totals for Stasny, Stewart and Duchene. Not as good, but VERY CLOSE to Ryan, Getzlaf, Perry.
That can't happen. If our top 3 .. our THREE franchise players are only 'as' good as those 3 (and no disrespect meant, those 3 avs are good players) then we are in trouble.
#7
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:54 AM
#8
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:00 PM
The motivation is to GET the $5 million salary. Once you have it, though, and you've already won a Stanley Cup...and now an Olympic Gold Medal...what's the motivation? It has to come from within and it doesn't appear that either of these guys have it. They should be dominating games right now, not floating through them.
#9
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:03 PM
They get that money whether they play well or not, hail. There is no incentive clause.
#10
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:15 PM
#11
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:17 PM
How is potty training going to help?
#12
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:21 PM
touche lol
#13
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:24 PM
I have a few ideas.
One of them starts with an iron supplement.
The other one starts with a laxative.
I imagine you can see where I'm going with this.
#14
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:26 PM
With his status in doubt just before the olympics Getz had to do something to prove to the Canadian brass he was healthy and ready to go. He then went and had maybe his best game of the season... against the Oilers but still. Just sayin.
#15
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:33 PM
With his status in doubt just before the olympics Getz had to do something to prove to the Canadian brass he was healthy and ready to go. He then went and had maybe his best game of the season... against the Oilers but still. Just sayin.
Great point! I'm glad I made it in the first post of this thread.
#16
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:35 PM
haha - ooppss! I guess I was skim reading and missed that, or on the phone with a customer.
Shhhhhh!
#17
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:36 PM
#18
Posted 04 March 2010 - 12:39 PM
Shhhhhh!
Don't sweat it. Great minds think alike.
#19
Posted 04 March 2010 - 01:06 PM
Same Captain tho!
#20
Posted 04 March 2010 - 03:46 PM
#21
Posted 04 March 2010 - 08:39 PM
That Calgary game was HUGE. If we would have won, we would have went into the Olympic break in 8th place. It is my opinion that Getzy took advantage of the situation and CHOSE to sit it out. He was questionable for the Edmonton game as well, but when Team Canada said they would have to see if his ancle was okay otherwise he would be replaced; BAM... miracle recovery, and an awsome performance.
I agree with you T.L. I've had these thoughts throughout the season. Although I never expressed it, I had felt that during the early part of the season, that RC should have benched him for a game just to send a message. I wish he would have, now I don't think we can afford it.
We also can not afford any more lackluster efforts!
#22
Posted 04 March 2010 - 11:19 PM
jesus christ, they just came back from the olympics, the fans here are so spoiled i swear
You think he chose to sit out?
do yourself a favor and delete this post, flatout pathetic you would say such a thing about a player who has played through injuries ALL the time
get real man, this is insulting to a warrior like getzlaf
#23
Posted 05 March 2010 - 12:01 AM
Team full of George Parros's (Parroses?)!
#24
Posted 05 March 2010 - 12:05 AM
They didn't even leave the Pacific time zone.
And I think the plural of Parros is Parrai.
#25
Posted 05 March 2010 - 07:24 AM
Honestly, I think that is the problem. Don't get me wrong, Scott Neidemayer is a great Captain and a hell of a player, but he lacks the vocal presence that could be what is needed. If Mike Babcock talking to Getz/Perry got them to step up their game, and Steve Yzerman questioning whether or not Getz could play got him to outright dominate.. maybe what is needed is somebody in the locker room to step up and question them. Push them to do better and let them know when they are slacking off. I'm no expert on what goes on in the locker room currently, but if somebody(it doesn't have to be the C) were to step up and start pushing people vocally to do better that could be enough to spark their effort night after night.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













