<link>
Yet Another Undisclosed Location
#1
Posted 29 March 2005 - 10:45 PM
<link>
#3
Posted 29 March 2005 - 10:50 PM
Waste of good air those morons are breathing if you ask me.
#4
Posted 29 March 2005 - 11:06 PM
Los Angeles Kings' president Tim Leiweke says the NHL will return this fall. <link>
Hmmm, it appears that "Lie-weekly" and "Day-lie" are at odds over Fall predictions ...
#5
Posted 30 March 2005 - 07:36 AM
#6
Posted 30 March 2005 - 11:05 AM
I have to poke fun. I'm not irritated anymore. I feel like I'm watching the 3 Stooges or something.
#7
Posted 30 March 2005 - 11:23 AM
This lockout has really turned me into a grouchy old f@rt - sorry! I have no sympathy for either side. Sports are not sports anymore. It's like the games that are played are a side-effect of their business.
What they should do is rent out a brewery, or something, and get rip-roaring drunk. Who knows what they'll sign then?
#8
Posted 30 March 2005 - 11:52 AM
#9
Posted 30 March 2005 - 11:52 AM
#10
Posted 30 March 2005 - 12:04 PM
Here you go Lady Francaise...watch them all you want:
#11
Posted 30 March 2005 - 01:06 PM
Don't worry I think a lot of us feel that way
#12
Posted 30 March 2005 - 08:51 PM
DTP, thanks for the 3 Stooges.
#13
Posted 30 March 2005 - 10:29 PM
DTP, thanks for the 3 Stooges.
I think it's great. Nothing like a bit of alcohol to sooth the pain. Now, if they could add a bit of laughing gas into the room, we have a chance!
#14
Posted 30 March 2005 - 11:30 PM
DTP, thanks for the 3 Stooges.
I think it's great. Nothing like a bit of alcohol to sooth the pain. Now, if they could add a bit of laughing gas into the room, we have a chance!
#15
Posted 04 April 2005 - 08:48 AM
The sense of frustration is evident even between the two parties trying to end the lockout.
"I've stopped trying to forecast what might or might not happen," Daly said. "Certainly, we're going to continue to try to make a deal with the union that's fair to both sides but, more importantly, is good for the sport. And the sooner that can happen, the better for everyone."
<link>
#16
Posted 04 April 2005 - 08:57 AM
So the union, which held a conference call with players last week, has had a major decision to make. Do the players cut their losses now and put a cap offer on the table, let's say around $45 million, and call it a day? Or do they gamble that the NHL's next option, replacement players, will blow up in its face next fall and hand the leverage back to the union.
More players may also be present as the league attempts to diffuse the union's annoyance at not being involved when rule changes are being discussed. Ideas under review could be as drastic as making the nets bigger, eliminating the centre-ice red line and instituting penalty shootouts for regular-season games.
Also on the agenda in Detroit will be a discussion of the draft order for the 2005 class. The bottom-feeders want to stick with last year's standings to figure out the new draft order, while the big boys want a league-wide lottery where every team has a fair shot at the No. 1 overall pick.
<link>
#17
Posted 04 April 2005 - 05:48 PM
'The Players' Association began today's meeting by rejecting the two proposals made by the NHL on March 17,'' NHL executive vice-president Bill Daly said in a statement. ''Thereafter, we discussed the status of our current situation and, in general terms, possible concepts for moving the process forward. The meeting concluded with both sides agreeing to explore these concepts further internally, and to talk again later this week.''
A bigger group got together this time around, with NHLPA president Trevor Linden and the players' executive committee joining the fray as well as the negotiation team from the ownership group led by chairman of the board Harley Hotchkiss of the Calgary Flames, as well as New Jersey Devils GM and CEO Lou Lamoriello.
<link>
#18
Posted 04 April 2005 - 06:12 PM
#19
Posted 04 April 2005 - 06:24 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













