Jump to content


Bodychecks safer than once thought


6 replies to this topic

#1 Jennifer1515

    AKA T-PoP

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,850 posts
  • Location:limbo

Posted 01 November 2005 - 02:37 PM

READ ME
QUOTE
More injuries to minor hockey players are caused by unintentional collisions rather than bodychecks, according to a new study.
...
''Nine-year-olds do not walk away from their first year of bodychecking with incurable injuries,'' said Dr. Barry Willer, who led the research team from the University of New York at Buffalo. ''They walk away with the experience of having lived with bodychecking and the next year they have almost no injuries.''

Willer and his team used a sample of 2,630 boys over two seasons - the largest ever for a study of this kind - from the minor hockey association in Burlington, Ont.

...
The study found that injuries peaked in two age groups - the nine- and 13-year-olds.

The rise among nine-year-olds was attributed to it being their first season playing with body contact, while the spike in injuries to 13-year-olds was due to ''increased hormone levels,'' according to Dr. John Leddy, one of the study's co-authors
...
''If you don't want bodychecking, don't have bodychecking,'' he said. ''But if you have it, don't ever introduce it at 15 or 16 because that's dangerous.

''It's just flat-out dangerous.''

...
In addition to the findings on bodychecking, the study also found that players enrolled in rep hockey were six times more likely to be injured than those in house league and that injuries are four times more likely to happen in games than practices.


(yeah im know this is prob more than 10% of the article...but there were SOOO many interesting things i just had to share biggrin.gif )

#2 hockey2k

    Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,772 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Interests:Hockey, art, and outdoorsy stuff.

Posted 01 November 2005 - 04:06 PM

Very interesting article, thanks! I guess it does make sense to introduce checking earlier rather than later...it seems like most injuries would come from improper checking, making it more dangerous when you're learning to do it. 9 year olds have much less body weight to throw around while they are learning the proper technique than older kids, so let 'em get it right before they get big enough to do any damage.

#3 espben206

    1st Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,766 posts
  • Location:Moderator Queue
  • Interests:Hunting

Posted 01 November 2005 - 04:09 PM

So I guess the same rule would apply to fighting with 9 year olds? eyebrow.gif

#4 hockey2k

    Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,772 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Interests:Hockey, art, and outdoorsy stuff.

Posted 01 November 2005 - 04:35 PM

Bodychecking is not the same as fighting...I see it along the same lines as learning to tackle in football. And I don't see too many 9 year olds playing no touch football. Bodychecking is an acceptable hockey technique, fighting, crosschecking, checking from behind etc are not.

#5 Jennifer1515

    AKA T-PoP

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,850 posts
  • Location:limbo

Posted 01 November 2005 - 04:57 PM

good call H2K smile.gif

#6 Kimi

    Admiral Adama

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,675 posts
  • Location:Newcastle, England

Posted 01 November 2005 - 11:37 PM

I was nine or ten when I started playing full contact rugby at school. I think it's done because kids seem to be able to do it then. You're old enough to understand what you are doing and not get stupid with it. You can be tought how to do it the proper way, and if you do it young then you'll keep playing safe the rest rest of your life.

#7 espben206

    1st Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,766 posts
  • Location:Moderator Queue
  • Interests:Hunting

Posted 02 November 2005 - 12:44 AM

QUOTE (hockey2k @ Nov 1 2005, 04:35 PM)
Bodychecking is not the same as fighting...I see it along the same lines as learning to tackle in football. And I don't see too many 9 year olds playing no touch football. Bodychecking is an acceptable hockey technique, fighting, crosschecking, checking from behind etc are not.

I agree... (I was being sarcastic about the fighting part I wasn't endorsing it) I just didn't think that violent play has a role in 9 and 10 year olds sporting events... but the football part is a valid point...





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users