Assuming the Ducks make it to the WCF (Western Conference Finals) who would you rather have us play? I'm using "assuming" and "IF" here so the karma police doesn't give me a ticket. I can't decide who I like better: Thornton & Cheechoo or them dirty Oilers... Anyone?
0
Who to face in the WCF?
Started by Excoriar, May 10 2006 11:56 PM
13 replies to this topic
#2
-
- Members
-
- 62,085 posts
Shadow of the Ducks
Posted 11 May 2006 - 05:29 AM
Can we wait on this until we know the outcome of the current series with the Crapalanche? ... bad karma...
#3
-
- Members
-
- 3,762 posts
We gots the Cup!
- Location:Taipei, Taiwan
Posted 11 May 2006 - 06:02 AM
I know.. that's why I put all these ifs and assumes in the thread... let's wait.
#4
-
- Mods
-
- 7,780 posts
Hockeyaholic
Posted 11 May 2006 - 11:53 AM
The next game to focus on is tonight's game. I'm not looking ahead by one round or even two rounds. Neither can the boys. In reality, either team will be a challenge if we do make it that far.
#5
-
- Members
-
- 1,510 posts
Wheres the Blue Food?
- Location:Madison, Wisocnsin
- Interests:Wisconsin sports such as the Packers, Brewers, Bucks, Badgers, and Matt Kenseth. And of course da Ducks. I also am an avid weight lifter, James Bond fanatic, and Simpsons buff.I enjoy watching the History channel, and writing amateur screenplays. And my two role models are Sylvestor Stallone and the late George Carlin.
Posted 12 May 2006 - 07:01 PM
I don't wanna play either! Edmonton is the Raiders of hockey. They could cheap shot Selanne or another player out till January! San Jose is hot, and I want home ice advantage. If I had to choose, the Oilers.
#6
-
- Mods
-
- 7,780 posts
Hockeyaholic
Posted 12 May 2006 - 07:16 PM
Both teams have plusses and minuses to play against. Regardless of who we get, we'll need to be at our best, continue to give 110% each game, hard hitting, crashing the net, good goaltending, continue the excellent penalty killing, get contributions from every line, everyone do their job, score some goals, stay out of the penalty box, shut down their main threats to us, capitalize on their mistakes and make fewer mistakes on our own. And have fun!
#7
-
- Members
-
- 4,161 posts
Godlike
- Location:Lake Forest, California
- Interests:|
Posted 12 May 2006 - 07:59 PM
Bring them both on!
We will take both teams down at once!
We will take both teams down at once!
#8
-
- Members
-
- 11,913 posts
Easy Does It
- Location:CA's High Desert
- Interests:hockey, cooking and bugging the youth of the boards.
Posted 12 May 2006 - 10:48 PM
I've been waiting for a " battle for California" for years now. Talk about a hockey hot bed, it's California. 
#10
-
- Members
-
- 8,963 posts
Stanley Cup Champion!
Posted 13 May 2006 - 04:39 PM
I don't really care who we face 
If its the Sharks hopefully some of the AD members might be able to go up and see a game. Also the Ducks will be happier since its least miles to travel. But hockey wise doesn't matter who we face.
If its the Sharks hopefully some of the AD members might be able to go up and see a game. Also the Ducks will be happier since its least miles to travel. But hockey wise doesn't matter who we face.
#11
-
- Mods
-
- 10,161 posts
DUCK!
- Location:Estacada, OR
- Interests:Ducks hockey, keeping body and soul together, reading, DVD's, Pool,pool right here in river city.
Posted 13 May 2006 - 06:01 PM
Right on Joanne. 
#12
-
- Members
-
- 2,314 posts
On Wisconsin
- Location:Wisconsin
Posted 14 May 2006 - 03:55 AM
I'm scared to play San Jose.
#13
-
- Members
-
- 1,923 posts
1st Line
- Location:Cincinnati OH
Posted 14 May 2006 - 06:01 AM
Instead of "Don't matter. Bring 'em on!", I would vote for "Doesn't matter. Bring 'em on!".
#14
-
- Members
-
- 62,085 posts
Shadow of the Ducks
Posted 14 May 2006 - 07:01 AM
QUOTE(bryzfan1 @ May 14 2006, 07:01 AM)
Instead of "Don't matter. Bring 'em on!", I would vote for "Doesn't matter. Bring 'em on!".
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
