QUOTE
RFN? Right F---ing Now.
In the States, with the newspaper industry in free-fall and reporting staffs being stripped to the bone, the hockey beat is among the first to be sacrificed. Which means that as thin a slice of newspaper space as hockey used to get, it's a whole lot thinner now. In many markets, hockey is a "starter" beat for interns or fresh-from-journalism-school kids, so the level of analysis is understandably superficial, and TV reporting on hockey has to fit into such a tiny hole, it barely scratches the surface.
The newspaper business isn't any healthier here, the difference being that papers in Canada will cut anything BUT hockey coverage, because survey after survey of readership tastes keep coming back with the same results: give us more hockey, we'll live without the rest. And radio and television have all kinds of time, and staff, to devote to hockey.
So if anything, the disparity between the amount of external pressure exerted on an NHL franchise in Canada, compared with its American equivalent, is only growing larger.
Absent the heavy, everyday scrutiny and relentless demand for results, a player can work his way through a slump without being pilloried in the U.S., a coach can survive a losing streak, a smart hockey man can take his time, make a studied plan and stick to it until his team is built.
No such luxuries are available in Canada.
In the States, with the newspaper industry in free-fall and reporting staffs being stripped to the bone, the hockey beat is among the first to be sacrificed. Which means that as thin a slice of newspaper space as hockey used to get, it's a whole lot thinner now. In many markets, hockey is a "starter" beat for interns or fresh-from-journalism-school kids, so the level of analysis is understandably superficial, and TV reporting on hockey has to fit into such a tiny hole, it barely scratches the surface.
The newspaper business isn't any healthier here, the difference being that papers in Canada will cut anything BUT hockey coverage, because survey after survey of readership tastes keep coming back with the same results: give us more hockey, we'll live without the rest. And radio and television have all kinds of time, and staff, to devote to hockey.
So if anything, the disparity between the amount of external pressure exerted on an NHL franchise in Canada, compared with its American equivalent, is only growing larger.
Absent the heavy, everyday scrutiny and relentless demand for results, a player can work his way through a slump without being pilloried in the U.S., a coach can survive a losing streak, a smart hockey man can take his time, make a studied plan and stick to it until his team is built.
No such luxuries are available in Canada.
<link>











